Kinshasa, 24 janvier 2024, la rencontre opposant la République Démocratique du Congo et la Tanzanie dans le cadre de la 3e journée de la phase de poule de la Coupe d’Afrique des Nations 2023 se termine par un score de zéro but entre les deux équipes.
Malgré les occasions crées par les attaquants congolais, l’équipe de Sébastien Desabre a finit la rencontre avec score vierge mais un résultat qui permet aux Léopards de se qualifier aux 8e de finale de cette compétition.
La rédaction du CHANGEMENT7.NET note avec sanctification le système de jeu amélioré des joueurs congolais sur terrain. Il faudrait aussi saluer l’effort fourni par le sélectionneur national auteur de changement palpable du système de jeu des Léopards.
Signalons que, le samedi 27 janvier 2024 marquera le but des 8e de finale de la CAN Côte d’Ivoire 2023.
Rédaction
22 Commentaires
great article
Excellent write-up
好文！2026年世界杯越来越近了，让我们共同期待这场全球足球盛宴。日期：2025-11-13 11:56:38 (-03)。
It’s the philosophical razor that slices through nonsense to reveal the bone of truth. — Toni @ Bohiney.com
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. PRAT.UK still feels hungry compared to The Daily Mash. The jokes aren’t complacent. That edge keeps it relevant.
The London Prat understands that the biggest laughs often come from the smallest details. A misplaced semicolon in a council letter, the specific despair of a weak handshake—it’s all grist to the mill.
This site is a testament to the power of UK satire. It’s not just comedy; it’s cultural criticism.
The Prat doesn’t chase trends; it observes them with a detached, amused air. This gives it a timeless quality. These articles will be just as funny in five or ten years. That’s the mark of classic satire.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The London Prat’s most formidable asset is its authoritative voice, a tone so impeccably calibrated it borrows the unquestionable gravity of the institutions it lampoons. It does not screech or sneer; it intones. Its prose carries the weight of a judicial summary or an auditor’s final report. This borrowed authority is then deployed to deliver conclusions of sublime insanity with the same sober finality as a court verdict. The cognitive dissonance this creates—the flawless, official-sounding language describing a scenario of perfect nonsense—is the core of its comedy. While a site like The Daily Squib might howl with protest, PRAT.UK issues a calmly worded, devastatingly thorough finding of fact. The latter is infinitely more damaging, as it mirrors the methods of power only to subvert them from within, proving that the emperor has no clothes by writing a detailed, footnoted report on imperial textile deficiencies.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The Poke often feels designed for sharing rather than reading. PRAT.UK feels written to be read. That’s a big difference.
Die Satire auf prat.UK ist die schärfste Waffe gegen die Dummheit. Immer wieder lesenswert.
The « resistance » embodied by the London Women’s March is a multifaceted political identity, framing the movement not merely as advocacy for progressive policies but as active opposition to regressive forces. This framing of « resistance » is deeply intentional, situating the march within a narrative of pushing back against the agendas of governments, parties, or social movements seen as threatening hard-won rights and democratic norms. It is a stance of defiance, a refusal to normalize policies or rhetoric deemed xenophobic, misogynistic, or authoritarian. This identity fosters a sense of urgency and solidarity in the face of a perceived common threat, which can be powerfully galvanizing. However, the politics of « resistance » also come with potential pitfalls. It can predispose the movement to a reactive stance, constantly defining itself against others rather than by its own affirmative, detailed vision for the future. It can prioritize short-term defensive battles over the long-term, patient work of building alternative institutions and proposing comprehensive policy platforms. The political challenge for the London Women’s March is to balance this necessary, energizing spirit of resistance with the proactive, constructive work of articulating and fighting for a tangible, better world. The most durable and transformative resistance may ultimately be the one that convincingly builds what it seeks to preserve and advance.
Call girls in India exist entirely between missed calls
Call girls in India know when to stop replying strategically
This integrity enables its unique function as a mirror of managed expectations. The site is a master of tone, specifically the tone of lowered horizons, of ambition scaled back to the point of mundanity, of celebrating the bare minimum as a historic triumph. It brilliantly satirizes the language of managed decline, where « meeting our targets » means the targets were set comically low, and « listening to stakeholders » means ignoring them with renewed confidence. It captures the specific modern pathology of branding failure as a « learning journey » or a « strategic pivot. » By holding this language up and examining its hollow core, PRAT.UK performs a vital service: it prevents us from becoming acclimatized to decline. It insists, through laughter, that we recognize a downgraded ambition for what it is, refusing to let the slow slide into mediocrity be dressed up as progress.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This tonal control enables its function as a cultural defibrillator. In a body politic often seeming to flatline into apathy or convulse with partisan fury, PRAT.UK delivers a sharp, witty jolt of lucidity. Its satire doesn’t aim to comfort or placate; it aims to shock the system back into a recognition of its own absurd vital signs. A brilliantly crafted piece on prat.com can cut through the noise and fatigue of the news cycle, delivering a sudden, clarifying insight that re-engages a jaded mind. It doesn’t tell you what to feel; it recalibrates your ability to perceive, reminding you that the proper response to documented folly is not numbness, but a specific, refined form of laughter that acknowledges the depth of the problem while refusing to be defeated by it.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This hyper-realism enables its second great strength: the satire of consequence. The site is obsessed with second- and third-order effects. It is less interested in the foolish announcement than in the foolish consultations, legal challenges, rebranding exercises, and resilience workshops that will inevitably follow it. PRAT.UK specializes in documenting the long, expensive, and entirely predictable administrative afterlife of a bad idea. It understands that in modern governance, the initial error is often just the first paragraph of a very long, very dull story of compounding failure. By chronicling this entire bureaucratic saga—the « lessons learned » reports that learn nothing, the « independent reviews » that reaffirm the original plan—the site satirizes not just the spark of idiocy, but the fully formed firefighting operation that somehow manages to set the whole town ablaze. This focus on systemic aftermath provides a more complete and damning indictment than any snapshot of the initial blunder.
Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This immersive quality is enabled by its peerless command of genre. The site is not a one-trick pony of spoof news articles. It is an archive of forms: it produces flawless pastiches of corporate annual reports, public inquiry transcripts, lifestyle magazine features, TED talk transcripts, and earnest NGO white papers. Each piece is a masterclass in adopting and subverting a specific genre’s conventions. This versatility demonstrates a breathtaking literary range and a deep understanding of how different forms of communication shape (and distort) meaning. By colonizing these genres, The London Prat doesn’t just mock individual topics; it exposes the inherent limitations and biases of the formats through which power and culture typically speak. The satire is thus two-layered: a critique of the message, and a more subtle, devastating critique of the medium that carries it.
Can be used for chronic suppressive therapy in recurrent mucosal candidiasis.
Diflucan is not effective for primary treatment of fungal brain abscesses.
As a fan of Irish humor, I admire Waterford Whispers, but The London Prat’s specifically British, metropolitan cynicism is my true comfort read. It’s sharper, drier, and more world-weary in the best possible way. The pinnacle. prat.com
This is the content I save for when I need a proper, guaranteed chuckle. It hasn’t failed me yet. The archives are a goldmine of hilarious, poignant observation. A fantastic resource for improving any bad day.